Legal Opinion
Cromartie v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 8, 2008No. 07-3184Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Dana Cromartie seeks review of the Magistrate Judge’s order confirming the settlement of her employment discrimination claim against Appellee Sears Roebuck. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm.
I
In July 2005, Cromartie filed a pro se employment discrimination suit against Sears Roebuck. The court appointed counsel and the parties consented to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). During a phone conversation on March 22, 2007, Cromartie and Ronald V. Cole, Cromartie’s attorney in the matter, discussed settling the case. Appellant expressed that she wanted to…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- United States of America, No. 96-1848 v. Franklin Uzo Igbonwa A/K/A Franklin Uzowa, A/K/A Francis Igwe, A/K/A Laz Igbonwa. United States of America v. Franklin Uzo Igbonwa A/K/A Franklin Uzowa, A/K/A Francis Igwe, A/K/A Laz Igbonwa Franklin Igbonwa, No. 97-1054Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Binker v. PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Brisbin v. Superior Valve Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Covington v. Continental General Tire, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004