State v. Sheardon
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeowN, J.
We reverse the Court of Appeals.
The issue before this court is whether the pre-indictment identification procedure employed by the police in the absence of counsel requires that the victims’ in-court identification of defendant be excluded from the evidence.
In Kirby v. Illinois (decided June 7, 1972), U. S. , the Supreme Court refused to extend the per se exclusionary rule established in United States v. Wade (1967), 388 U. S. 218, and Gilbert v. California (1967), 388 U. S. 263 (as to identification testimony based upon post-indictment lineups conducted without notice to, and in the absence…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. JellsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Jells v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- State v. EcholsOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. ParkerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. KaiserOhio Supreme Court · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.