Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bray v. Russell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2000No. 1998-2694PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 132.] THE STATE EX REL. BRAY, APPELLANT, v. RUSSELL, WARDEN, APPELLEE. HADDAD V. RUSSELL, WARDEN. WHITE, APPELLEE, v. KONTEH, WARDEN, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Bray v. Russell,

2000-Ohio-116.] Criminal law—Bad time added to prison term for violation occurring during course of prisoner’s stated prison term—R.C. 2967.11 violates the constitutional doctrine of separation of powers and is therefore unconstitutional. R.C. 2967.11 violates the constitutional doctrine of separation of powers. (Nos. 98-2694, 99-273 and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. GambleOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. State v. HendersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. State v. Dotson, Ca2007-11-025 (9-29-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. RisterOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. State v. MaysOhio Supreme Court · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API