Legal Opinion

Manca, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 8, 1958No. 62164; protest 308919-K (New York)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This protest is limited to two items of merchandise described on the invoice as “Reflecting viewfinders” or “Polarizing filters” and marked “A” and checked “WR.” The articles were assessed with duty at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1551 of the Tariff Act of 1930 *319as parts of photographic cameras, not specially provided for. Plaintiff claims that the merchandise is dutiable at only 15 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 1551, as modified by T. D. 52739, supplemented by T. D. 52820, for “Photographic cameras not specially provided…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Protest 106783-K of Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API