Kernaghan v. Sunshine Mining Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Justice.
This is a proceeding under the occupational disease compensation law. ’ The appellant claims compensation for total disability due to silicosis. The respondent (employer) is self-insured.
One of the issues tried is the extent to which disability was due to silicosis. §§ 72— 1208, 72-1218, 72-1220 I.C. On this the board found:
“ * * * It is not shown that tuberculosis of the lungs is a complicating factor.
“The board finds that claimant is totally and permanently disabled for remunerative work, but suc’h disability is not due to silicosis alone. Silicosis is, 'however, an…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Haynes v. . Feldspar Producing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Beaver v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
- In Re LarsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Walker v. HogueIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
- Soran v. McKelveyIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Beutler v. MacGregor Triangle CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- Dawson v. HartwickIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
- Flasche v. Bunker Hill CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
- Darvell v. Wardner Industrial UnionIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
- Clark v. Brennan Construction CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.