Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge WRIGHT.
Dissenting opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge MacKINNON.
J. SKELLY WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
Two unions — the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers (BLE) and the United Transportation Union (UTU) — object to the Interstate Commerce Commission’s interpretation of labor issues arising from ICC’s approval of a railroad consolidation.
The unions claim that, when the dust settled from the consolidation, certain railroads had effectively squeezed them out of their previous role in determining the crews used on particular routes. At the time, in early…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- McLean Trucking Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Boston & Maine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Brotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company, Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Intervenors. United Transportation Union v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company, Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985