Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. Wolff
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided February 12, 1996No. CV-N-94-549-ECRPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
EDWARD C. REED, Jr., District Judge.
Kevin Reynolds and David Staude (hereafter “Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint (# 1) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging the violation of their constitutional rights. Plaintiffs are represented by private counsel. Plaintiffs have twice been granted leave to amend their complaint. Pending is plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (#25), which names Charles Wolff, Zoetta Waggener, Curt Sun-dell and Barbara Jirak as defendants. Defendants renewed their previously filed Motion to Dismiss in regard to the second amended complaint (#24).…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilson v. HarperDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1996
- Brown v. TrombaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- Mitchell, Jr. v. BreitenbachDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025