Legal Opinion

Elkhorn Piney Coal Mining Co. v. Hazelett

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 6, 1932No. 6029PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.

On June 22, 1929, appellee was injured through the negligence of one Harry S. MeKalip, mine superintendent of the appellant company, who was then driving an automobile furnished by appellant for his *138use at or about the mines. The sole question for our consideration is whether MeKalip was at the time engaged upon the business of his employer so as to make the latter liable for his tort under the doetrine of respondeat superior. The general rule is no longer open to doubt. “The master’s responsibility cannot be extended beyond the limits of the master’s work. If the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Denton v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Linstead v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Railroad Company v. HanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. White v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  2. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. DonelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API