Legal Opinion

Weems v. Boillot

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 26, 1976No. 75-370PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s refusal to set aside a default judgment in an action upon a promissory note. There were two defendants, Howard Weems and McKinley Weems, co-makers of the note. Howard alone appeals. Although three points for reversal are argued, the principal issue is whether the court erred in simultaneously setting aside the default judgment against McKinley but refusing to set it aside as to Howard.

The original amount of the note was $7,029.73. The complaint alleged, and an indorsement on the note showed, a part payment of $3,252.45,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kohlenberger, Inc. v. Tyson's Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Burt v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  3. Mann v. Ray Lee SupplySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. Parke v. MeyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1873
  5. Moss v. GibsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1842

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ryan v. RyanNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API