Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Thrasher

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 28, 2001No. 92 CIV 6987 JFKPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KEENAN, District Judge.

Before the Court are Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (which Defendants Hugh Thrasher and Jonathan Hirsh oppose) and Defendant Jonathan Hirsh’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the alternative, Partial Summary Judgment. For the reasons outlined below, both motions are denied in their entirety.

BACKGROUND

The Court assumes familiarity with its earlier opinions in this case, and provides below only a rudimentary recitation of the facts as needed for this decision.

Plaintiff Securities and Exchange…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Shelley Weinstock v. Columbia UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  4. Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  5. Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Newman and ChiassonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  2. In Re Washington Mutual, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2011
  3. Martin v. City of ReadingDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Soulé v. Alliot (In Re Tiger Petroleum Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2004
  5. Walker v. CarterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API