Legal Opinion

Matthews v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 11, 1924No. 3368PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAGE, Circuit Judge.

The indictment charges conspiracy to commit an offense by the unlawful manufacture, etc., of intoxicating liquors. Several overt acts are charged, followed by what was probably intended by the grand jury to be an overt act, but which in fact charges an unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors.

1. It is urged that the two complete offenses charged in one count make the whole indictment bad because of duplicity. Plaintiffs in error, here called defendants, were represented by different attorneys, Marsh by McGlynn, and Matthews by Thomas. Each made a formal motion to quash,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haywood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920
  2. Lewellen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blackmon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  2. Beauchamp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
  3. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. CochranCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API