Legal Opinion
Lewellen v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 13, 1915No. 4149PublishedCited by 10 opinions
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma; Ralph E. Campbell, Judge, E. Eewellen was convicted of introducing intoxicating liquor into the Indian country from without the state of Oklahoma, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
[1, 2] Defendant Eewellen was tried and convicted in the court below on an indictment reading as follows:
“United States of America, Eastern District of Oklahoma. The grand jurors of the United States of America * * * on their oath do find, present, and charge that one L. Lewellen, on the 13th day of February, A. D. 1913, in the county of Tulsa, state of Oklahoma, in the said district and within the jurisdiction of said court, the said county then and there being a portion of the Indian country of the United Stales of America, did at the time and place aforesaid…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crain v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Wiborg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Bates v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Joplin Mercantile Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Ex Parte Webb.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. DembowskiDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1918
- Goff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- Cecil v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Matthews v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
- Parks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.