Legal Opinion

McHenry v. Ridgely

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1840PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This cause was heard in the Court below at the March term, 1838, before the Hon. Jesse B. Thomas. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for $ 400 debt, and $ 16,93 damages. The defendant appealed to this Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, Chief Justice

This was an action by petition and summons, by Ridgely against McHenry, upon the following note:

“ $ 400. Jacksonville, Nov. 4th, 1836.
“ On or before the sixteenth day of July next, I promise to pay E. W. Palmer or order, four hundred dollars, for value received. Witness my hand and seal.
“ George McHenry, [seal.] ”

On which are the following assignments:

“ For value received, I assign the within note to T. Worthington. E. W. Palmer.
“Dec. mh, 1836.”
“ Pay to N. H. Ridgely, Esq., Cashier, or order.
“ T. W ORTHINGTON.”

The defendant pleaded three pleas in bar, alleging, in substance, First, That the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Porter v. NekervisCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1826

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Feulner v. GillamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1918
  2. Bippus v. VailAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923
  3. People ex rel. Dickes v. EganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API