Legal Opinion

MALHAN v. PORRINO

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 2, 2020No. 2:16-cv-08889Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY SURENDER MALHAN., Plaintiff, Civil Action No: 16-8889(SDW)(LDW) v. OPINION CHRISTOPHER S. PORRINO, et al., Defendants. April 2, 2020 WIGENTON, District Judge. Before this Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 56. Jurisdiction is proper pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1331

and 29 U.S.C. § 185. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391. This opinion is issued without oral argument pursuant to Rule 78. For the reasons stated herein, Defendants’ motions…

2Cases cited29 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.