Legal Opinion

Virginia Municipal Group Self-Insurance v. Crawford

Salem County Circuit Court

Decided November 24, 2004No. Case No. (Chancery) CH03-59PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge Stanley P. Klein

In these Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment, the court must address the Complainant Virginia Municipal Group Self-Insurance Association’s (“VML”) assertion that Virginia law recognizes a cause of action for unjust enrichment, which entitles it to a reimbursement of workers’ compensation benefits it previously distributed to Defendant Gary Chance Crawford following an injury sustained within the scope of his employment. VML contends that Virginia has a strong public policy against injured parties receiving a double recovery for their injuries and that the principles…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Railroad Co. v. KoontzSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Feitig v. ChalkleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
  4. Oleyar v. Kerr, TrusteeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  5. Acuar v. LetourneauSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Escobar v. Zurich American InsuranceFairfax County Circuit Court · 2011
  2. Haugenoe v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Haugenoe v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API