People v. Glass
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION
Appellant was convicted by a jury of possession of amphetamines for sale (Health Saf. Code, § 11351) and was found not guilty of possession of hypodermic syringes (Bus. Prof. Code, § 4143, subd. (a)). On this appeal from the judgment he urges insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and misconduct of the prosecutor. We find merit in his contentions and reverse the judgment.(1) To support a conviction of possession of amphetamines for sale, it…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- People v. RedmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. DouglasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. GomezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- People v. SeatonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.