Legal Opinion
Duff v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 18, 1997No. C3-96-1786PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Michael Roy Duff appeals from a district court order sustaining the revocation of his driving privileges under the implied consent statute. Duffs limited right to consult with counsel prior to deciding whether to submit to chemical testing for alcohol concentration was not vindicated because he was not allowed a reasonable time to meaningfully consult with his attorney. We reverse.
FACTS
On April 14, 1996, at approximately 2:45 a.m., Oak Park Heights Police Officer Kenneth Anderson arrested appellant Michael Roy Duff for driving under the influence of alcohol. After Officer…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Davis v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Kuhn v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Davis v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kristin Marie Poeschel v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Damon Dewitt Tackett v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Duff v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997