Legal Opinion
Nolan v. Prime Tanning Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 27, 1989No. 88-2037PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.
James and Angie Nolan appeal from district court1 orders denying their motion to remand their products liability case to state court, and granting summary judgment to the Prime Tanning Company, Inc. and Ralph Moore because they were not engaged in the business of selling the machine in question, a required element for strict liability under Missouri law. The No-lans argue that this case was improperly removed from state court, since one defendant did not join in the removal petition, and that the case therefore should have been remanded. They also argue that in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Grubbs v. General Electric Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jack Fristoe v. Reynolds Metals Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Buford v. TremayneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Abraham Loudermill and Joyce Loudermill v. The Dow Chemical Company v. M-P Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Dale J. Leininger v. Sue Ann LeiningerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Payne Ex Rel. Estate of Calzada v. BrakeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Donald J. Johnson v. Patrick H. BurkenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Joseph L. Koehnen v. Herald Fire Insurance Company, Defendant/garnishee--Appellee, Rachel Sarah PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Financial Timing Publications, Inc. v. Compugraphic Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Lawson v. KellyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.