Eddowes v. Niell
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
4 U.S. 133 (____)
4 Dall. 133
Eddowes et al.
versus
T. Niell.
Supreme Court of United States.
Tilghman, and Bowie, for the plaintiffs.
Ingersoll, Smith, and Duncan, for the defendant.
By the COURT:
Letters of credit are a common, and useful, instrument in the course of commerce. They are, however, of a very serious nature; and the writer is bound to comply with the contents, according to their genuine and honest import. In order to render them obligatory as a contract, it is not necessary, that they should be answered, if credit is given upon them. Like the case of transmitting a bond in a letter,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nicholson's Lessee v. WallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1798
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re ScheidmantelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Cope v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1822
- Hoffman v. JohnsonHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1826