Legal Opinion

Eddowes v. Niell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 1, 1793PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

4 U.S. 133 (____)

4 Dall. 133

Eddowes et al.

versus

T. Niell.

Supreme Court of United States.

Tilghman, and Bowie, for the plaintiffs.

Ingersoll, Smith, and Duncan, for the defendant.

By the COURT:

Letters of credit are a common, and useful, instrument in the course of commerce. They are, however, of a very serious nature; and the writer is bound to comply with the contents, according to their genuine and honest import. In order to render them obligatory as a contract, it is not necessary, that they should be answered, if credit is given upon them. Like the case of transmitting a bond in a letter,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nicholson's Lessee v. WallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1798

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re ScheidmantelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Cope v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1822
  3. Hoffman v. JohnsonHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1826

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API