Legal Opinion

Loftis v. Eck

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 4, 1986No. 0642PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sanders, Chief Judge:

This is an appeal from an order setting aside a deed. Appellants Margaret Loftis Eck and Willene Loftis Ginn, acting pursuant to a power of attorney executed by their mother, respondent Madge Rice Loftis, deeded her property to themselves for a stated consideration of $5. Mrs. Loftis sued Mrs. Eck and Mrs. Ginn seeking to have the deed set aside. The trial court granted this relief on the ground that Mrs. Eck and Mrs. Ginn breached their fiduciary duty to Mrs. Loftis. We affirm.

Mrs. Eck and Mrs. Ginn argue that, because Mrs. Loftis couched the allegations of her complaint…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fender v. FenderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. McCallum v. GrierSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  3. Kirven v. LawrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  4. Crocker v. CrockerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Steele v. Victory Savings BankCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  2. Hendricks v. Clemson UniversityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Armstrong v. SCHOOL DIST. FIVE, LEXINGTON, RICHLANDDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1998
  4. Argoe v. Three Rivers Behavioral Center & Psychiatric SolutionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  5. Argoe v. Three Rivers Behavioral Center & Psychiatric SolutionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API