Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. SCHOOL DIST. FIVE, LEXINGTON, RICHLAND
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided October 15, 1998No. Civ.A. 3:997-903-0PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PERRY, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the Plaintiffs’ motion is granted and the motion of the Defendant is denied.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD
To grant a motion for summary judgment, this Court must find that “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact.” Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c). The judge is not to weight the evidence, but rather to determine if there is a genuine issue for trial. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). If no material factual disputes…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Davis v. Greenwood School District 50Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Garner v. State, Department of EducationHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009
- Abraham v. Palmetto Unified School District No. 1Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Abraham v. PALMETTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000