Legal Opinion

Poirier v. United States

District Court, D. Maine

Decided August 16, 1990No. Civ. 88-0251-BPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AGREED FACTS AND FURTHER FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW BY THE COURT

LOUGHLIN, Senior District Judge.

This is an action under the Federal Tort Claims Act. David R. Poirier seeks to recover damages for personal injuries. His wife, Margo C. Poirier has brought suit for loss of consortium.

The parties through counsel have stipulated as to joint findings of fact which are incorporated by reference into this order and will be further augmented by the court's findings.

Liability was admitted by the defendant anent the abdominal surgery performed on February 24, 1986 on David Poirier. A six inch…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Donna Reilly, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  5. Moran v. Quality Aluminum Casting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lowry v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
  2. Laskowski v. United States Department of Veteran AffairsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Kenney v. US Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2003
  4. Callahan v. Ancestry.com Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
  5. Knapke v. PeopleConnect IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API