Sioux Biochemical, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, IN PART, PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(6) OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STRIKE PURSUANT TO RULE 12(f)

BENNETT, Chief Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.INTRODUCTION. GO 00 t-

A. Factual Background. OO 00 t>

B. Procedural Background. 05 00 t-

II. LEGAL ANALYSIS.790

A. Standards ForARule 12(b)(6) Motion To Dismiss.791

B. Application Of The Standards To The Challenged Claims.792

1. Count V: Fraudulent misrepresentation.792

a. Arguments of the parties.792

b. Analgsis.795

2. Count VI: “Correction of inventorship”.798

3. Count VII: Conversion of intellectual…