Legal Opinion
Mencher v. Chesley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 24, 1946PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover- damages for an alleged libel, order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and denying in part defendant’s motion to strike several paragraphs from the complaint, to-der rule 103 of said Rules, modified by adding to the second ordering para*1041graph the following numbered paragraphs of the complaint: 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 23. As thus modified, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. We do not pass…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- O'Connell v. . Press Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Grant v. Reader's Digest Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Balabanoff v. Hearst Consolidated Publications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Hoey v. New York Times Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Hills v. Press Co.New York Supreme Court · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gross v. MallamudNew York Supreme Court · 1951