Legal Opinion

Gross v. Mallamud

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAaron J. Levy, J.

Motion to dismiss the complaint for legal insufficiency. The complaint sets forth that at a meeting of the Parents’ Association of the Mosholu Parkway Junior High School the defendant called the plaintiff “ a Communist and a Communist plant ”. Since no special damages are alleged the complaint must be dismissed unless the utterance is held to be slanderous per se.

*6In Garriga v. Richfield (174 Misc. 315) it was held that it was not slanderous per se to make a false charge that a person is a communist. On the other hand, the written publication, if untrue, that one is a communist has been held…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mencher v. ChesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Garriga v. RichfieldNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Mencher v. ChesleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ward v. Forest Preserve DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  2. Gurtler v. Union Parts Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API