Legal Opinion

Landauer v. Hoagland

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Wyandotte District Court. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Simpson, C.:

The petition in error filed in this case contains eight assignments of error, which, as is alleged, occurred during the trial in the court below. These errors, to be considered by this court, must have been called to the attention of the trial court by a motion for a new trial; and the adverse ruling of the trial court on the motion for a new trial must be specifically assigned as error in the petition in error filed in this court. This has not been done. The action of the trial court in overruling the motion of plaintiffs in error for a new trial is not assigned as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carson v. FunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J. J. Douglas Co. v. SparksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  2. Roper v. FerrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API