Legal Opinion
Castillo v. Progressive Insurance
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 15, 2021No. 3:19-cv-01628Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IRMA CASTILLO, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-CV-1628 : Plaintiff : (Judge Conner) : v. : : PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE, : : Defendant : MEMORANDUM Plaintiff Irma Castillo asserts two claims against her automobile insurer, defendant Progressive Insurance (“Progressive”). Castillo claims that Progressive breached her insurance policy and that it made a settlement offer in bad faith in violation of 42 PA. CONS. STAT. § 8371. Progressive moves for summary judgment on Castillo’s statutory bad-faith claim. I. Factual Background &…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Lawrence Thomas v. Cumberland CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.