Legal Opinion

Aunan v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 12, 1985No. CX 84 1388PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Respondent John Aúnan was arrested for D.W.I. and taken for testing. An In-toxilyzer 5000 infrared breath-testing device was administered. Respondent failed to successfully provide two adequate breath samples and his license was revoked for having “refused” to permit testing. Minn.Stat. § 169.123, subd. 4 (1982). Following an implied consent hearing, the trial court found that respondent cooperated in providing a sample and never refused to provide an adequate sample. The court rescinded the revocation of respondent’s driving privileges. We remand.

FACTS

Respondent was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Palbicki v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Godderz v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Carlson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Burke v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Bale v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Lewandowski v. TschidaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API