Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kleinberg v. Heller

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 8, 1976Published

1ConcurrenceFuchsberg, J.

Literally tens of thousands of our citizens are parties to joint savings accounts.1 Yet the law relating to it has been in a state of morass, many of the cases which arise being treated very much on an ad hoc basis. Therefore, while I concur in the result here, I believe it well that the legal guidelines that have led me to that conclusion be spelled out.

The Surrogate before whom this very case was tried suggested the following summary for remarks on this subject which he delivered months after his decision here: "Perhaps in no other area of the law governing distribution of decedent’s…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Moskowitz v. MarrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Marrow v. MoskowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. In Re the Estate of SuterNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. In Re the Estate of JuedelNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. MATTER OF BRICKER (KRIMER) v. KrimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API