Legal Opinion
MATTER OF BRICKER (KRIMER) v. Krimer
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 6, 1963PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDye, J.
In this discovery proceeding, pursuant to section 1377-b of the Civil Practice Act, the committee for an incompetent seeks to recover moneys representing the proceeds of two bank accounts which, allegedly, are being wrongfully withheld by the respondent herein.
It is undisputed that on June 27, 1957 the incompetent’s husband, Hija Krimer, used his personal funds to open two accounts in the Harlem Savings Bank, one in the name of ‘1 Anna Krimer or Hija Krimer, payable to either or the survivor ” with a deposit of $20,000. In this connection both husband and wife executed signature cards and a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moskowitz v. MarrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Marrow v. MoskowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- In Re the Estate of SuterNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- In Re the Estate of PoriandaNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- In Re the Estate of JuedelNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- In Re the Estates of CovertNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- In re the Estate of FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Filippi v. FilippiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Keokuk Savings Bank & Trust Company v. DesvauxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Leffew v. MayesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.