Legal Opinion
State v. Adams
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided August 22, 2008No. Criminal Action Nos. IN-07-12-0915, IN-07-12-0916, IN-07-12-0917, IN-07-12-0918, IN-07-12-0919, IN-07-12-0920; ID No. 0711017054PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HERLIHY, Judge
Defendant Steven Adams has moved to suppress two separate sets of evidence. The first set was from a car, stopped for a traffic offense, in which he was a passenger. He contends the police lacked reasonable articulable suspicion to detain him, did not follow proper detention procedures and, finally, lacked probable cause to arrest him and seize the evidence from the car.
Subsequent to that arrest, the police obtained a search warrant for his residence. Adams claims the affidavit of probable cause is insufficient and, therefore, the evidence seized .from his residence…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- United States v. Joseph A. TravisanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- State v. RankenSuperior Court of Delaware · 2010
- State of Delaware v. Kimberly GilbertDelaware Court of Common Pleas · 2017
- State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.