Bartholomew v. Fischl
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TROUTMAN, District Judge.
A dispute which arose between plaintiff, the executive director of the Bicity Health Bureau (Bureau), and defendants, the City of Allentown and Frank Fischl, a city official, regarding the propriety of fluoridating the drinking water culminated in a “retaliatory, protracted, public dialogue, including defamatory accusations” leveled at plaintiff by defendants whose purpose was to “destroy [plaintiff’s] career in public health”. Plaintiff contends that defendant’s “retaliatory campaign” included false charges of “immorality or dishonesty”, cost…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Eaby v. RichmondDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Petrone v. City of ReadingDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Skrocki v. CaltabianoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- D.W. Realty, Inc. v. Harford Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Logical Minicomputers of Erie, Inc. v. FoxDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.