Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Kansas City

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 12, 1956No. 45326PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Commissioner.

In this action against his employer, Kan-' sas City, for negligent personal injury, consisting. in failing to furnish safe tools and a safe place to work, a jury awarded Charles. Marshall $9,000. Upon motion, however,, the trial court set the verdict aside and entered judgment against Mr. Marshall for the reason that a verdict should have been directed for the city at the close of all the evidence. Upon this appeal by Mr. Marshall the single question is whether, construing the circumstances favorably to him, the fellow servant doctrine is applicable and a bar to his…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Logsdon v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Graczak v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  3. Gimmarro v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  4. Greenan v. Emerson Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  5. Fischer v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Curt Peters and Cheri Peters v. Wady Industries, Inc., and Patrick TerrioSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  2. Hansen v. RitterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Leeper v. AsmusMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State Ex Rel. Scott v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  5. McComb v. NorfusSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API