Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Scott v. Kirkpatrick

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 6, 1972No. 58080PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Judge.

In the trial court, relators, who were identified as citizens and taxpayers of this state, sought a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel respondent, the Secretary of State, to accept for filing and certify as legally sufficient certain “initiative petitions” calling for submission to the electorate at the General Election to be held on November 7, 1972, a proposed amendment, commonly referred to as the “soft drink tax” amendment, to the constitution of this state. Intervenor, also identified as a citizen and taxpayer, was allowed to intervene as a party respondent. Relief was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moore v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  2. State ex rel. Halliburton v. RoachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  3. State ex rel. Barrett v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  4. City of Cape Girardeau v. RileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  5. State Ex Rel. Board of Fund Commissioners v. HolmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wanda Mayes v. Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City, (Consolidated with)Wanda Mayes v. Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  2. Stumpf v. LauNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  3. United Labor Committee of Mo. v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  4. State Ex Rel. City of St. Louis v. KinderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  5. State Ex Rel. City of Blue Springs v. RiceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API