Legal Opinion
Burdick v. Bratt
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 15, 1994No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: The jury’s award of $282,000 for past *951and future pain and suffering is not inadequate and does not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see, CPLR 5501 [c]; Baksys v Berton, 169 AD2d 695). There was insufficient evidence adduced at trial, however, to support the jury awards for past and future loss of earnings and past impairment of earning ability. Plaintiff failed to provide…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reichman v. Warehouse One, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Kaylor v. Amerada Hess Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Baksys v. BertonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kramer v. Showa Denko K.K.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Patterson v. Kummer Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Colezetti v. PircioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Margerum v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Schillace v. Price Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.