Brendan Ngehsi Newanforbi v. Derrick, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRENDAN NGEHSI NEWANFORBI, Case No. 2:26-cv-0004-DJC-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 DERRICK, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is required to participate in a parole re-entry program. Plaintiff, proceeding pro 18 se, alleges that the program’s director, his parole officer, and his parole officer’s supervisor have 19 violated his constitutional rights. Defendants separately move to dismiss. For the reasons stated 20 below, plaintiff’s first amended complaint will be dismissed with leave to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.