Legal Opinion

Minich v. City of Sharon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 1984No. 941PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This appeal is from the grant of a counterclaim in an action for replevin. Appellant claims that the court improperly considered a counterclaim not secured by a lien on the property. While appellant is correct in his statement of the law, he has waived his argument through failure to file exceptions. Judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

The relevant procedural history can be briefly summarized.

Verdict 9/20/79

Notice of Appeal 10/24/79

Judgment 10/26/79

Notice of Appeal 11/14/79

The first item of note here is that, at the time of the 10/24 Notice of Appeal, no judgment had been entered,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Straw v. SandsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. J.F. Walker Co. v. Excalibur Oil Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Keystone Dedicated Logistics, Inc. v. JGB Enterprises, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Kaminski v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Clinton v. GilesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Kaminski v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API