Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Scahill

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 25, 1943No. 3418PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff’s car was proceeding westerly and the defendant’s easterly, when the plaintiff’s left rear fender came in contact with the defendant’s left front fender. The plaintiff’s car then deflected to the right and after going a distance of seventy feet, hit a snowbank two or three feet high and not too hard packed, where it had been plowed back from the pavement. Straddling this bank, the plaintiff’s car proceeded sixty feet through the snowbank and brought up against a pole with such force as to do considerable damage to the front of the car and to throw the driver forward onto the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dowling v. L. H. Shattuck, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
  2. Niemi v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
  3. Weiss v. WassermanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
  4. Cedergren v. HadawaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
  5. James E. Watkins Co. v. Peterson Motor ExpressSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shoe v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Stephanofsky v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  3. Watson v. Regional Transportation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  4. State v. BerrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  5. Cross v. Estate of PatchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API