Legal Opinion

People v. Merrill

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 18, 1991No. 90CA0832PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge CRISWELL.

The defendant, Georgina E. Merrill, appeals from the judgment of the trial court that directed the forfeiture of some $10,000 in currency pursuant to the provisions of the Colorado Contraband Forfeiture Act, § 16-13-501 through § 16-13-508, C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8A) (the Act). Insofar as it is within our jurisdiction to do so, we affirm.

The Act defines “contraband article” to include any controlled substance as defined in § 12-22-303(7), C.R.S. (1985 Repl.Vol. 5). Further, any currency given in exchange for a contraband article is itself “contraband property,” which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. GuentherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. High Gear & Toke Shop v. BeacomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Rancho Colorado, Inc. v. City of BroomfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  4. Harding v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. People v. MacIasColorado Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. RussomColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. GrellColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. People v. Four Thousand Three Hundred Thirty-Eight Dollars ($4338.00) in U.S. CurrencyColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Peo v. VogelColorado Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API