Legal Opinion

Greenawalt v. Shannon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 5, 1848PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In error from the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin county. John Shannon, the defendant in error, brought trespass for killing his cow, before a justice of the peace, against William Greenawalt, the plaintiff in error. From the judgment of the justice on the report of referees, defendant appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin county. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of this court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnside, J.

This was an action of trespass for hilling a cow of plaintiff, who is defendant in error, before Justice Snyder. - No amount of plaintiff’s demand appears to haye been stated on the justice’s docket. The parties referred the cause to three of their neighbours, who awarded for the plaintiff $15, damages and costs. The testimony returned with the record shows that no witness valued the cow at less than $25. From the award Shannon the plaintiff appealed, and filed a declaration in the Common Fleas, laying his damages at $250. To this declaration the defendant entered a plea, and afterwards a…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Neel, Insurance Commissioner v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Brands v. WiseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  3. Wanamaker v. Beamesderfer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API