Lustig v. Beth Israel Hospital
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWalter R. Hart, J.
Plaintiff wife has commenced this action to recover damages for injuries due to the alleged malpractice of defendants. Her husband’s cause of action is the usual derivative one for loss of services and medical expenses. The defendants are the hospital, a surgeon and an anesthetist. The complaint alleges that in the course of an operative procedure for a Caesarean section two of plaintiff wife’s front teeth were injured and fractured at their roots. The negligence allegation of the complaint is in the following form: ‘1 Twelfth : Plaintiff jessie lustig relies upon res ipsa loquitur and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Leonard v. Watsonville Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Oldis v. La Societe Francaise De Bienfaisance MutuelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Schroeder v. City County Savings Bank, AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Bauer v. OtisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Seltzer v. IsaacsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- F. W. Newman & Son, Inc. v. Hillyard Sales Co.New York Supreme Court · 1961