Jeanes v. Hamby
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1DissentGuillot, Justice
I respectfully dissent. While I would hold that the trial court improperly granted summary judgment to Hamby, Shaver, and McSpedden, I would hold that there is a material fact issue as to whether the releases which Jeanes gave Hamby and Shaver were valid. I would further hold that res judicata barred Jeanes’ cause of action for conspiracy to defraud. However, I agree with the majority’s disposition of Je-anes’ contention regarding post-judgment j interest.
i I believe an additional rendition of the facts is in order. I shall attempt to succinctly set them out in the chronological order of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hubacek v. Ennis State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Texas Water Rights Commission v. Crow Iron WorksTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Industrial Life Insurance Company v. FinleyTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- First Texas Savings Ass'n of Dallas v. Dicker Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Gilbert v. Fireside Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.