Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jeanes v. Hamby

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided October 30, 1984No. 05-83-00452-CVPublished

1DissentGuillot, Justice

I respectfully dissent. While I would hold that the trial court improperly granted summary judgment to Hamby, Shaver, and McSpedden, I would hold that there is a material fact issue as to whether the releases which Jeanes gave Hamby and Shaver were valid. I would further hold that res judicata barred Jeanes’ cause of action for conspiracy to defraud. However, I agree with the majority’s disposition of Je-anes’ contention regarding post-judgment j interest.

i I believe an additional rendition of the facts is in order. I shall attempt to succinctly set them out in the chronological order of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hubacek v. Ennis State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Texas Water Rights Commission v. Crow Iron WorksTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Industrial Life Insurance Company v. FinleyTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  4. First Texas Savings Ass'n of Dallas v. Dicker Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Gilbert v. Fireside Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API