Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Shriver v. Leech
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 1981PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COOPER, Justice.
This action in the nature of quo warranto and for declaratory and injunctive relief was filed in the Chancery Court of Davidson County challenging the authority and action of the Attorney General and Reporter of the State of Tennessee in issuing a “Civil Investigative Demand” directed to Norman M. Lipman, President, Wine & Spirits Wholesalers of Tennessee. 1 On considering a motion to dismiss, which was treated as a motion for summary judgment since it was predicated in part on affidavits, the chancellor dismissed the quo warranto phase of the case. In the other phase…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Richardson v. Tennessee Board of DentistryTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- State, Department of Revenue v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
- McNiel v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
- Wilson Corp. v. State Ex Rel. UdallNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- State Ex Rel Herbert H. Slatery III v. Chevron CorporationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.