Langford v. Oklahoma State Bank

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

Interveners present only the first assignment of error in their brief, which is error of the court in overruling the motion of interveners for a new trial. Under this assignment of error they argue three propositions:

“First. There was a .complete failure of the plaintiff to introduce proof in support of the allegations of his petition, not in some particulars only, -but in the general scope of his alleged cause of action.

“Second. That said contract in so far as it attempted to determine the amount of damages in advance of any breach thereof is void.

‘Third. The court erred…