Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Tanenblatt
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided March 10, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
C. Raymond Radigan, J.
In a proceeding brought pursuant to SCPA 2103 to recover part of the proceeds of a life insurance policy, the executrix moves for summary judgment against respondents, Sheila Tanenblatt, decedent’s former spouse and William Penn Life Insurance Company.
As part of their divorce settlement decedent and his former spouse, Sheila Tanenblatt, entered into a separation agreement under which he agreed to pay her $769.23 per week for a period of five years ending August 31, 1995 or until the death of either party, whichever event occurred earlier. As security…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Simonds v. SimondsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Olmsted v. . KeyesNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Rogers v. RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Markwica v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Males v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Foster v. HurleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004