Legal Opinion
Cator v. Herrgott & Wilson, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 12, 1984No. C-83-0149 WHOPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION *
ORRICK, District Judge.
The question presented by the cross-motions for summary judgment in this case is whether the Pension Committee of a plan subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq., violated ERISA by changing only thirty days before his retirement the valuation date of benefits paid to plaintiff. Plaintiff, George Cator (“Cator”), the former president of defendant Herrgott & Wilson, Inc. (“H & W”), a commodities brokerage firm in San Francisco, California, seeks to recover $72,-000 that he…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Taylor Roark v. John L. Lewis, Maude W. Reese, of the Last Will and Testament of Joe S. Rees(e) v. John L. Lewis, Theo R. Fuller v. John L. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Don Ray Smith v. Cmta-Iam Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Rose Gordon, as Administratrix of the Estate of Angelina Miller v. Ilwu-Pma Benefit FundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Eddie Jackson Houston, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chao v. Hall Holding Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Chao v. Hall Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Howard v. ShayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Kay v. Thrift and Profit Sharing PlanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Montgomery v. Aetna Plywood, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.