Lone Star Steel Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
Plaintiffs challenge a final negative International Trade Commission (“ITC”) determination. 1 ITC found that the injury suffered by the domestic oil country tubular goods (“OCTG”) industry was not by reason of imports of OCTG from Argentina. Plaintiffs make two basic arguments: (1) ITC improperly failed to consider data regarding increased shipments of Argentine imports, lost sales and revenue and (2) ITC improperly failed to cumulate data on volume and effects of Argentine and Spanish OCTG imports.
Facts
Plaintiffs filed administrative petitions on June 13, 1984, stating…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gifford-Hill Cement Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- American Grape Growers Alliance for Fair Trade v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
3Cited by12 opinions
- USX Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Granges Metallverken AB v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Neenah Foundry Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- USX Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Makita Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.