Legal Opinion

City of Winooski v. Companion

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 28, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, C.J.

This action is brought to recover taxes alleged to be due on a certain piece of real estate in the plaintiff city. The pleadings terminated in a demurrer to what would be at common law the plaintiff’s replication. This demurrer was sustained, and the plaintiff excepted.

The merits of the controversy depend upon the meaning of G. L. 691, which provides that certain buildings erected after June 1, 1922, used and occupied exclusively as a home, may be exempted from taxation for a limited time if the town wherein they are located so votes. The building here involved was erected for occupancy, not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anniston City Land Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Town of Sheldon v. Sheldon Poor House Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  3. Essex Storage Electric Co. v. Victory Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. First Nat'l B'k v. Comr. of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  2. Diamond v. VickreySupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
  3. Crystal Brook Farm, Inc. v. Control CommissionersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  4. Chaput v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
  5. First Nat'l B'k v. Comr. of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API