Legal Opinion

Ingram v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 16, 1939No. 9181PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment upon conviction of appellant for having morphine in his possession in violation of Section 2c of the Jones-Miller Act, 42 Stat. 596 (21 U.S.C. § 174, 21 U.S.C.A. § 174), and for conspiring in the violation with one Joseph A. Woods. Appellant seeks reversal for a claimed prejudicial cross-examination of his principal witness, his wife, Ann Ingram, tending to degrade her in matters having no relevant connection with the prosecution. The objections to the questions asked and exceptions to the court’s rulings sufficiently present for our…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. People v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. McKune v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  4. Conner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Leon A. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Gordon Arthur Lyda and Albert Francis Perrault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  3. United States v. John David ProvooCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  4. United States v. Keith Edward Allende, United States of America v. Serito Trujillo Montoya, United States of America v. Donna Rae SilsbeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. Ingram v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API