Legal Opinion
Barker v. Muskingum County Jail
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 21, 2022No. 2:21-cv-04987Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION DUSTIN EDWIN BARKER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 2:21-cv-4987 Judge Sarah D. Morrison MUSKINGUM COUNTY JAIL, et al., Magistrate Elizabeth P. Deavers Defendants. ORDER AND INITIAL SCREEN REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiffs Dustin Barker and Michael Morrow, pretrial detainees at the Muskingum County Jail, bring this prisoner civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1-1, 8.) By separate orders, both Barker and Morrow were granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 4 and 14.) This matter is…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.